New York Employment Law Case News

Pimentel v. Barone Steel, Inc..; Civil Case No.: 19-cv-07280

New Action filed in the Eastern District of New York

Pimentel v. Barone Steel, Inc..; Civil Case No.: 19-cv-07280 

On December 30, 2019, Plaintiff Pimentel, on behalf of himself, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly-situated, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Eastern District of New York against BARONE STEEL, INC. (“Defendant”), alleging as follows:

Plaintiff worked for Defendant – – a Brooklyn-based construction and steel fabrication company – – from on or about March 8, 2018 until on or about August 3, 2019, first as a helper assisting Defendant’s iron workers while learning that position and then as an iron worker.  As described below, throughout the entirety of his employment, Defendant failed to pay Plaintiff all of the wages lawfully due to him under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”).  Specifically, in both positions, Defendant required Plaintiff to routinely work, and Plaintiff did work, in excess of forty hours each week, but Defendant failed to compensate Plaintiff at the rate of one and one-half times his regular rate of pay for any hours that Plaintiff worked in excess of forty in a week. Instead, as reflected on his paystubs, and to the best of Plaintiff’s recollection, the wage notice with which Defendant provided him at hire, Defendant paid Plaintiff at an hourly rate for only his first forty hours of work each week, and thus Defendant failed to compensate Plaintiff at any rate of pay for the hours that he worked in excess of forty each week, let alone at the statutorily-required overtime rate of one and one-half times his regular hourly rate of pay for any hours that Plaintiff worked in excess of forty in a week, in violation of the FLSA and the NYLL.  Furthermore, Defendant failed to provide Plaintiff with accurate wage statements on each payday as the NYLL requires.

Defendants paid and treated all of its helpers and iron workers in the same manner.  Accordingly, Plaintiff brought this lawsuit against Defendant pursuant to the collective action provisions of the FLSA, on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly-situated who suffered damages because of Defendant’s willful violations of the law.

If any individual is or has previously been an employee of the Defendants named in the lawsuit and/or has information that may be relevant to this case, please contact Borrelli & Associates, P.L.L.C. as soon as possible through one of our websites, www.employmentlawyernewyork.com or www.516abogado.com, or any of our phone numbers: (516) 248–5550, (516) ABOGADO, or (212) 679–5000.

Published by
Borrelli & Associates

Recent Posts

What are the Legal Implications of Employee Handbooks in New York?

Employee handbooks are more than just guides for workplace policies. They can have real legal…

5 days ago

Judge grants Conditional Certification of Collective Action in the United States District Court Southern District of New York

Alonzo Baez v. Mariscos Ramirez, Inc. d/b/a Marisco Centro and Zolio Ramirez a/k/a Chelo Ramirez,…

6 days ago

What Should You Know about Remote Work Agreements in New York?

Remote work has become a permanent part of the employment landscape, especially in New York.…

3 weeks ago

Are Workplace Dress Codes Legal in New York?

In New York, many employers still enforce dress codes, even in today’s more casual work…

4 weeks ago

Understanding the Rights of Gig Economy Workers Under New York Employment Law

The gig economy has changed the way many people in New York earn a living.…

2 months ago

Are Workplace Confidentiality Agreements Enforceable in New York?

Confidentiality agreements have become a standard part of many workplaces. Employers often use them to…

2 months ago