Gittens v. 7-Eleven, Inc. Docket No.: 2:17-CV-06378

New Class and Collective Action filed in the Eastern District of New York
Gittens v. 7-Eleven, Inc. Docket No.: 2:17-CV-06378

On November 1, 2017, Plaintiff Shakeira Gittens, on behalf of herself and those similarly situated, filed a collective action lawsuit in United States District Court – Eastern District of New York against 7-Eleven, Inc. The complaint alleges as follows: Plaintiff worked for Defendant – – a national convenience store chain – – as an hourly employee from on or around July 23, 2015 through on or around May 19, 2017. Throughout her employment, Plaintiff worked for Defendant at three different store locations on Long Island. Until in or around mid-May of 2016, Plaintiff commonly worked over forty hours per week, and was consistently paid overtime compensation at the rate of one and one-half her regular rate of pay for all hours worked over forty. But then, beginning on or around May 20, 2016, 7-Eleven Field Consultant Jason Ferencz began managing Plaintiff’s store, as well as at least three other stores on Long Island. In his capacity as Field Consultant, although Plaintiff continued to work overtime hours each week or nearly each week, Ferencz instructed Plaintiff’s store manager, and other 7-Eleven Store Managers, to manually edit their stores’ employee time records by shaving time off of their hours worked, thereby avoiding paying them their overtime pay for many hours per week. This continued until approximately December 27, 2016, when – – to escape detection for his nefarious scheme – – Ferencz blamed Plaintiff’s store manager for the 7-Eleven time-shaving practice. Furthermore, Defendant violated the NYLL by failing to provide Plaintiff with accurate wage statements on each payday during the Relevant Time Period. Accordingly, Plaintiff brings this lawsuit against Defendant pursuant to the collective action provisions of the FLSA, 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), on behalf of herself, individually, and on behalf of all other persons similarly-situated during the applicable FLSA limitations period who suffered damages as a result of the Defendant’s violations of the FLSA. Plaintiff also brings this lawsuit as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, on behalf of herself, individually, and on behalf of all other persons similarly-situated during the applicable NYLL limitations period who suffered damages as a result of Defendant’s violations of the NYLL and the supporting New York State Department of Labor regulations

If any person worked for the defendant named in the lawsuit during the time period of Tuesday, November 1, 2011 – present or has information that may be relevant to this case, contact the employment lawyers at Borrelli & Associates, P.L.L.C. as soon as possible through our websites, www.employmentlawyernewyork.com or www.516abogado.com, or any of our phone numbers: (516) 248-5550, (516) ABOGADO, and (212) 679-5000.

Recent Posts

What are the Legal Implications of Employee Handbooks in New York?

Employee handbooks are more than just guides for workplace policies. They can have real legal…

6 days ago

Judge grants Conditional Certification of Collective Action in the United States District Court Southern District of New York

Alonzo Baez v. Mariscos Ramirez, Inc. d/b/a Marisco Centro and Zolio Ramirez a/k/a Chelo Ramirez,…

6 days ago

What Should You Know about Remote Work Agreements in New York?

Remote work has become a permanent part of the employment landscape, especially in New York.…

3 weeks ago

Are Workplace Dress Codes Legal in New York?

In New York, many employers still enforce dress codes, even in today’s more casual work…

4 weeks ago

Understanding the Rights of Gig Economy Workers Under New York Employment Law

The gig economy has changed the way many people in New York earn a living.…

2 months ago

Are Workplace Confidentiality Agreements Enforceable in New York?

Confidentiality agreements have become a standard part of many workplaces. Employers often use them to…

2 months ago