General Employment Law

Le v. Triza Electrical Corp., and Chris Triantafillou, individually and Abdessamad Elhaddad, individually,Civil Case No.: 19-cv-05134

New Action filed in the Eastern District of New York

Le v. Triza Electrical Corp., and Chris Triantafillou, individually and Abdessamad Elhaddad, individually,
Civil Case No.: 19-cv-05134

On September 9, 2019, Plaintiff Le filed a lawsuit in the United States Eastern District Court of New York against TRIZA ELECTRICAL CORP., and CHRIS TRIANTAFILLOU, individually, and ABDESSAMAD ELHADDAD, individually, (collectively as “Defendants”), alleging as follows:

Plaintiff, who is Vietnamese, worked for Defendants – – a Queens-based electrical contracting company, its Chief Executive Officer and day-to-day overseer, and the company’s foreman who was Plaintiff’s direct supervisor – – as an electrician from approximately January 2016 until in or around February 1, 2018.  As is relevant herein, from January 1, 2017 until the end of his employment in or around February 1, 2018 (“the Relevant Time Period”), Defendants failed to pay Plaintiff the wages lawfully due to him under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), and the N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. (“NYCRR”).  Specifically, during the Relevant Time Period, Defendants required Plaintiff to work, and Plaintiff did in fact work, in excess of forty hours each week or virtually every week, yet these Defendants failed to compensate Plaintiff at the rate of one and one-half times his regular rate of pay for all hours that Plaintiff worked in excess of forty in a week.  Instead, Defendants paid Plaintiff a flat weekly wage that operated to cover only the first forty hours that he worked in a week, and thus Defendants failed to compensate Plaintiff at any rate of pay, let alone at the statutorily-required overtime rate of one and one-half times his regular rate of pay for any hours that Plaintiff worked in excess of forty in a week, in violation of the FLSA, the NYLL, and the NYCRR.

If any individual is or has previously been an employee of the Defendants named in the lawsuit and/or has information that may be relevant to this case, please contact Borrelli & Associates, P.L.L.C. as soon as possible through one of our websites,www.employmentlawyernewyork.com or www.516abogado.com, or any of our phone numbers: (516) 248–5550, (516) ABOGADO, or (212) 679–5000.

Published by
Borrelli & Associates

Recent Posts

Judge grants Conditional Certification of Collective Action in the United States District Court Eastern District of New York

Carcamo v. Tacos El Poblanito Inc. d/b/a Tacos El Poblanito and Daniel Barrios Castillo, individually,…

3 days ago

Carcamo v. Tacos El Poblanito Inc. d/b/a Tacos El Poblanit, and Daniel Barrios Castillo, individually; Index No.:1:25-cv-5339

New Action filed in the United States District Court Eastern District of New York On…

1 week ago

Borrelli & Associates Announces Andrew C. Weiss, Esq. Has Been Named Partner

Borrelli & Associates, P.L.L.C. is pleased to announce that Andrew C. Weiss, Esq. has been…

2 weeks ago

What NYC Retail Workers Need to Know About the Retail Worker Safety Act

Retail employees in New York City deal with a variety of issues in the workplace.…

2 weeks ago

What New York Parents Should Know About Pregnancy and Parental Leave Rights

Preparing for a new child comes with major changes, both personally and professionally. For employees…

3 weeks ago

How to Make Sure You’re Paid Overtime Correctly in New York

Many employees in New York assume that if they work overtime hours, their paycheck will…

3 weeks ago