On May 10, 2019, the New York City Council’s bill prohibiting employers from drug testing prospective employees for marijuana and tetrahydrocannabinols (“THC,” the active ingredient in marijuana) was passed into law. The law, which is the first of its kind in the country, makes such testing an unlawful discriminatory practice under the New York City Human Rights Law.
Under the law, employers, labor organizations, employment agencies, and their agents are prohibited from requiring a prospective employee to submit to a marijuana or THC drug test as a condition of employment. However, while many people will soon no longer have to face this barrier for future employment opportunities, the numerous exceptions demonstrate that the New York City Council acknowledges the importance of pre-employment marijuana testing for certain safety-sensitive positions, including:
The New York City Commission on Human Rights is expected to issue further rules regarding the law’s implementation. The law will take effect on May 10, 2020, giving New York City employers one year to prepare.
Note that the new law will apply only to “prospective” employees. Therefore, employer drug-testing programs in New York City that test current employees for marijuana will remain lawful. The law also does not prevent employers for screening job applicants for unlawful drugs other than marijuana or THC. For more information about marijuana in the workplace, click here.
The private use of marijuana is just one act that may result in unlawful discrimination by potential employers. Other common discriminatory questions and tips about how to handle such interview topics can be found here. If you feel that have been discriminated against during the job application process, you might have a right to take legal action. Please contact Borrelli & Associates, P.L.L.C. today for a consultation.
When you work hard for your paycheck, you expect to receive the money you have…
Losing your job can be stressful, even when you see it coming. If your employer…
September 2026 Firm represented a female employee against her former company for sexual harassment and…
Judge grants Conditional Certification of Collective Action in the United States District Court Southern District…
Judge grants Conditional Certification of Collective Action in the United States District Court Eastern District…
August 2026 Firm represented a female employee against her former employer for sexual harassment, gender…