Settlements & Verdicts

Jones v. Pawar Bros Corp., et al., Case No :1:17-cv-3018-PKC-SJB

Firm Secures a Trial Win with a Verdict in the amount of $100,601.00 – Wage and Hour Violation

Firm represented a dispatcher/tow truck driver against his former employers Pawar Bros. Corp., USAC Towing Corp., and Harjinder Singh, individually, for, unpaid overtime wages in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law. Generally, the Plaintiff alleged that the Defendants required Plaintiff to work, and Plaintiff did work, in excess of forty hours for each week or virtually each week, yet the Defendants failed to compensate Plaintiff at one and one-half times his regular rate of pay for all hours that he worked in excess of forty each week. In addition, Defendants failed to provide Plaintiff with accurate wage statements on each payday as the New York Labor Law required. Making matters worse, after Plaintiff complained to Defendants about their failure to pay him overtime compensation despite requiring him to work over forty hours per week, Defendants retaliated by terminating Plaintiff’s employment. Shockingly, during Plaintiff’s case, the Defendants attempted to allege that Defendants never employed Plaintiff at all, and that he was instead an independent contractor that Defendants only called for occasional work.  After a long trial, the jury verdict rendered in favor of Jones in the amount of $100,601.00, awarded as (1) unpaid overtime wages for Defendants violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law of $36,400.00; and (2) damages for Defendants’ retaliatory firing of Plaintiff in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law in the amount of $64,201.00, composed of $4,201.00 in compensatory damages and $60,000.00 in punitive damages; Michael J. Borrelli, Alexander T. Coleman, and Andrew C. Weiss handled the matter on behalf of the firm with Andrew C. Weiss operating as trial counsel.  Plaintiff also prevailed on his claim for an additional $5,000.00 in damages for Defendants’ failure to provide accurate wage statements in violation of the New York Labor Law on summary judgment.  Plaintiff has recently filed his post-trial motion where he anticipates being awarded additional damages in the form of liquidated damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the amounts awarded to him, and attorneys’ fees.

Published by
Borrelli & Associates

Recent Posts

Navigating the Complexities of Disability Accommodations in New York Employment

Disability accommodations are meant to ensure that everyone has a fair chance to succeed at…

6 days ago

What are the Legal Implications of Employee Handbooks in New York?

Employee handbooks are more than just guides for workplace policies. They can have real legal…

2 weeks ago

Judge grants Conditional Certification of Collective Action in the United States District Court Southern District of New York

Alonzo Baez v. Mariscos Ramirez, Inc. d/b/a Marisco Centro and Zolio Ramirez a/k/a Chelo Ramirez,…

2 weeks ago

What Should You Know about Remote Work Agreements in New York?

Remote work has become a permanent part of the employment landscape, especially in New York.…

4 weeks ago

Are Workplace Dress Codes Legal in New York?

In New York, many employers still enforce dress codes, even in today’s more casual work…

1 month ago

Understanding the Rights of Gig Economy Workers Under New York Employment Law

The gig economy has changed the way many people in New York earn a living.…

2 months ago