New York Employment Law Case News

Demyan v. Fortress Investment Group LLC, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors, LLC., Index No.:657383/2020

New Action filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York

Demyan v. Fortress Investment Group LLC, Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors, LLC., Index No.:657383/2020 

On December 31, 2020, Plaintiff Demyan filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York County of New York against FORTRESS INVESTMENT GROUP, (“FIG”), and FORTRESS TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTORS, (“FTAI”), and together with FIG, where appropriate, as “Defendants”), alleging upon knowledge as to himself and his own actions and upon information and belief as to all other matters, as follows:

Plaintiff performed and completed work for Defendants – – a publicly traded global investment management company and a publicly traded infrastructure and equipment leasing company that are both headquartered in Manhattan and that together acquire and manage assets, real property, infrastructure, and equipment on a global basis – – from in or around July 2018 until approximately February 2019 in connection with Defendant’s 485 megawatt natural gas power plant project located at Defendant’s wholly-owned subsidiary, the Long Ridge Energy Terminal, in Hannibal, Ohio (“Long Ridge Energy Project”).  As described below, Defendants, without providing Plaintiff with a written contract, engaged Plaintiff to secure a buyer for the methanol produced from the natural gas reserves located on or in close proximity to the power plant’s land.  Plaintiff performed that work for Defendants as agreed, yet despite accepting Plaintiff’s work, receiving an invoice from Plaintiff for it, and not objecting to it, Defendants have failed to make any payments to Plaintiff, leaving an outstanding principal balance of $200,000.00, which remains due and payable to Plaintiff as unpaid compensation under the Freelance Isn’t Free Act (“FIFA”), or under a common law theory of an unpaid account stated, breach of contract, or unjust enrichment.  Plaintiff is also entitled to recover from Defendants double damages and attorney’s fees under FIFA, as well as statutory damages for Defendants failure to provide Plaintiff with a written contract at the time of hire.

If any individual is or has previously been an employee or contractor of the Defendants named in the lawsuit and/or has information that may be relevant to this case, please contact Borrelli & Associates, P.L.L.C. as soon as possible through one of our websites, www.employmentlawyernewyork.com or www.516abogado.com, or any of our phone numbers: (516) 248–5550, (516) ABOGADO, or (212) 679–5000.

Published by
Borrelli & Associates

Recent Posts

What are the Legal Implications of Employee Handbooks in New York?

Employee handbooks are more than just guides for workplace policies. They can have real legal…

5 days ago

Judge grants Conditional Certification of Collective Action in the United States District Court Southern District of New York

Alonzo Baez v. Mariscos Ramirez, Inc. d/b/a Marisco Centro and Zolio Ramirez a/k/a Chelo Ramirez,…

6 days ago

What Should You Know about Remote Work Agreements in New York?

Remote work has become a permanent part of the employment landscape, especially in New York.…

3 weeks ago

Are Workplace Dress Codes Legal in New York?

In New York, many employers still enforce dress codes, even in today’s more casual work…

4 weeks ago

Understanding the Rights of Gig Economy Workers Under New York Employment Law

The gig economy has changed the way many people in New York earn a living.…

2 months ago

Are Workplace Confidentiality Agreements Enforceable in New York?

Confidentiality agreements have become a standard part of many workplaces. Employers often use them to…

2 months ago